Mostly Cloudy,63°
Saturday, May 18, 2013

Wall might fall, but retains nabe’s character

By Adam Wisnieski
Posted 11/16/11

The 93-unit high-rise proposed for the vacant lot at 3469 Cannon Place has been stalled because of concerns over the stability of a retaining wall on the site.

Charles Moerdler, chair of Community Board 8’s Land Use committee and member of the Board of Directors of the New York City Housing Development Corporation, said HDC would not issue bonds to Jackson Development because the project is not a priority considering the city’s financial constraints.

At a Community Board 8 hearing on April 4, Jackson Development announced the building would consist of 60 percent market-rate and 40 percent affordable apartments,  making it eligible for financing through municipal bonds. Neil Weisman, owner of Jackson Development, said at that meeting that the company would need those bonds to move forward.

“At this time, this is not a priority item,” Mr. Moerdler said of HDC. “What does that mean in English: it ain’t going anywhere for a while.”

For members of the Fort Independence Park Neighborhood Association — a group of neighbors fighting for years against development on the lot — that’s good to hear. 

“We’re happy and relieved to hear that news, but we’ll remain extremely vigilant about this property,” Kristin Hart of FIPNA said.  

FIPNA’s “Ten Reasons FIPNA Opposes the Proposed Cannon Place Development” begins with the public safety risk posed by the fragile retaining wall, which partially collapsed in 1979.

If the wall were to fall again, there would be extensive damage to houses and apartment buildings on Cannon Place and below the wall, on Fort Independence Street.

The Department of Environmental Protection plans to fix the Cannon Place wall in 2013, but Mr. Moerdler said the wall needs to be fixed now. 

 “If we don’t get that wall fixed and it comes down, what happened on Henry Hudson Parkway will be a plaything,” Mr. Moerdler said at last week’s Community Board 8 meeting, referring to the retaining wall that collapsed in Upper Manhattan in 2005. 

Next Page
2 comments on this story | Add your comment
Please log in or register to add your comment
margaretbx

Wow-- big news! There are other issues with this proposal besides the retaining wall, of course. It's an expensive site on which to build, and so Jackson was planning to charge $1700 for a 2 bedroom, 1 bath apartment without a separate kitchen -- well over the market, I would say. And moving the vehicle entrance to Fort Independence had more to do with minimizing the additional traffic to two narrow one-way streets, Cannon Place and Giles Place.

It's great to hear that this ill-conceived project is no longer on the fast track (or may be completely off the tracks). Wednesday, November 16, 2011|Report this

mscrab2u

Thank Goodness!! Now, if only we can get rid of the builder who is proposing the 63 unit apt. building on Giles Place. Thursday, November 17, 2011|Report this

Terms of Use | Advertising | Contact Us             © 2013 Richner Communications, Inc. | Powered By: Creative Circle Advertising Solutions, Inc.