Monte accused of breaking promise


Nearly one month after promising to withdraw plans for a controversial new facility on Riverdale Avenue, Montefiore Medical Center has not done so.

The Department of Buildings’ (DOB) website lists the application as disapproved, although details are not clear. A DOB spokesperson said the website would list the application as withdrawn if that action had been taken.

Montefiore Medical Center and the Simone Healthcare Development Group, which is designing the new facility, declined to comment on the situation.

Elected officials who trumpeted Montefiore’s promise to withdraw its plans at a January meeting of Community Board (CB) 8’s Land Use Committee meeting said DOB’s rejection of the plans for an 11-story facility on Riverdale Avenue was more important than whether or not Montefiore had withdrawn its design.

“It still has the same effect,” state Sen. Jeff Klein said. “If the same effect is [that] they’re not moving forward with the plan that was proposed at the Community Board’s Land Use Committee, we’re at square one again.”

Still, Assemblyman Jeffrey Dinowitz said the fact Montefiore did not carry out its promise “does not instill confidence in the community.”

Since Montefiore unveiled its plans for a 95,000-square-foot, multi-use facility in the fall, hundreds of community members have attended CB 8 meetings to voice their opposition to the facility, saying it is not needed here and calling Montefiore’s approach to the process imperious.

CB 8 Land Use Committee Chairman Charles Moerdler blasted Montefiore for not fulfilling its promise.

“It is something I for one find extremely disappointing,” Mr. Moerdler said. “Because if in this minor detail, they cannot keep their word, what assurance do we have that in major details they will keep their word?”

CB 8 Chairman Robert Fanuzzi said Montefiore’s position puts politicians who touted the hospital’s promise in an awkward situation.

“I can’t speak to Montefiore’s motives, but if they haven’t done it, they’ve put our elected officials in a very poor position,” Mr. Fanuzzi said.

Page 1 / 2


3 comments on this story | Please log in to comment by clicking here
Please log in or register to add your comment

I guess the only question I continue to have is why the elected officals are making such a push "against monte" in the west side of the 11th council district-while for 20 years-they cheered the expansion in the bedford park and norwood areas on the east side! I guess the Riverdale elected officals only believe monte based clients can only make money or can only help people on the east side of the district?

Friday, February 7, 2014


Friday, February 7, 2014

Ironic as Simone and Westmed unsuccessfully tried to do a similar project in the Five Towns and failed. The locals fought against a large medical building development and won. They are trying again but NIMBY! Now that Simone owns the property and we can only assume Monte has a lease, now what? Force us to accept a medical facility we don't need? When is enough, enough? Please go home Simone and Westmed.

Friday, February 7, 2014