Partly Cloudy,39°
Sunday, February 7, 2016

Newburgh Four bases appeal on entrapment

By Adam Wisnieski

Three judges in a federal Manhattan appeals court are currently considering whether the four men convicted of plotting to blow up the Riverdale Jewish Center and Riverdale Temple were entrapped by the government.

At an appeal hearing on Nov. 5, attorneys for the Newburgh Four — convicted in October 2010 and later sentenced to 25 years in prison — argued that the government engaged in misconduct when Federal Bureau of Investigation informant Shahed Hussain enticed the men with money and provided supplies for the plot. Lawyers argue the FBI informant, not the Newburgh Four, came up with the idea of attacking the synagogues and so the guilty verdicts should be overturned. 

James Cromitie, Laguerre Payen, Onta Williams and David Williams were arrested May 20, 2009 in Riverdale, after trying to plant explosives outside the two synagogues. 

After an eight-week trial and eight days of deliberations, all four men were convicted on Oct. 18, 2010 of conspiracy to use weapons of mass destruction within the U.S.; three counts of attempting to use weapons of mass destruction within the U.S.; conspiracy to acquire and use anti-aircraft missiles; attempting to acquire and use anti-aircraft missiles and conspiracy to kill officers and employees of the U.S.

In addition to trying to blow up the Riverdale synagogues, they were also found guilty of planning to shoot missiles at military planes located at Stewart Air National Guard Base near Newburgh, N.Y.

As the trial progressed, what was first perceived as a major victory for law enforcement became something of an embarrassment. Judge Colleen McMahon said the accused would have been unlikely to pursue terrorism without prodding from federal agents and an informant looking to manufacture an arrest.

While Judge McMahon said during the trial that she was not proud of how the government handled the case, she sentenced each man to 25 years in prison, the mandatory minimum sentence for the conviction.

“Only the government could have made a ‘terrorist’ out of Mr. Cromitie, whose buffoonery is positively Shakespearean in its scope,” she said at the sentencing.

Next Page


1 comment on this story | Please log in to comment by clicking here
Please log in or register to add your comment

i fail to see the problem with the governments handling of the matter. here are four morons who made a decision to accept money and supplies in oredr to carry out an attack on innocent people. what matter does it make that there were government agents involved with the plot.

1)each of the four made a decision to participate

2)they accepted money for their participation in the plan

3)they accepted what they believed to be the material to carry out the attack

4)they are seen on film outside of their target

these guys are guilty as hell and no amount of BS by them or their dirt bag attorney white wash their guilt in this plot.

Thursday, November 15, 2012 | Report this
Terms of Use | Advertising | Contact Us             © 2016 Richner Communications, Inc. | Powered By: Creative Circle Advertising Solutions, Inc.